Why vaccinate babies against a disease of whores and heroin addicts?
This smoking gun exposes the real agenda
How Do You Contract Hepatitis B?
Hepatitis B is a virus that affects the liver. The virus transmits through bodily fluids like:
blood
semen
vaginal secretions
You could contract hepatitis B in the following scenarios:
having sex without a barrier method with a person who has hepatitis B
sharing a needle or syringe with someone who has hepatitis B
using toothbrushes or razors exposed to blood that contains hepatitis B
receiving a tattoo or body piercing with unsterilized equipment
touching the blood of someone with hepatitis B when you have an open wound
A newborn baby can also contract hepatitis B during birth if the birthing parent has the virus.
Hepatitis B does not transmit through:
kissing
sneezing
coughing
I ain’t some kinda fucking RE Tard yet I am left dazed and confused trying to understand the message in this video.
‘Most people with hepatitis b are unknowingly infected during child birth’ Hang the fuck on … are they suggesting most mothers suck cock for money in back alleys and allow degenerate diseased fat old bastards bareback them with their festering peckers dumping Hep B infused loads into them?
Or that they are heroin addicts using shared needles to shoot their smack Out Back the Dumpster?
Because that is my understanding as to how MOST people contract this disease.
I am sure that SOME people contracted Hep B because they were unfortunate enough to have a mother who was a whore and/or heroin addict. But let’s just inject all infants - cuz.
Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for infants and children in a 4-dose schedule at birth, and 2, 4 and 6 months of age.
Even if a mother is unknowingly infected with Hepatitis B (why don’t they test for this instead of injecting every infant?), how in the fuck does vaccinating her baby months after being exposed to the virus prior to birth prevent the infant from contracting the virus? Duh.
Or maybe not. Maybe this is part of a brilliant master plan to ensure most of the barnyard animals slowly sicken and die before we get top heavy on useless feeders and collapse the economy.
Vaccines are Population Control
This is the follow up to Humans as Malnourished, Diseased-Riddled Beasts
I attempted to explain this to a circus animal recently and he disputed the fact that having a huge percentage of the population living beyond 65 would be a massive drain on the economy. Even when I asked him if he was willing to pay significantly higher taxes to fund their pensions and ongoing medical expenses, he held his quick sand.
He then went on to inform me that the likely reason they vaccinate infants against Hep B is because after they are born there is a chance they might get infected by a needle shared with other patients in the hospital. Right - so they share needles in first world hospitals… Duh.
And maybe a pedophile infected with Hep B might get his hands on a baby and do unspeakable things to it… right?
I am on an island here in the middle of an ocean of TFI’s (total fucking morons).
There is no escape.
Baking bread in an electric kettle
The first major problem with nuclear is that the type of energy produced is just not right. I know it hurts, but from a technical perspective the current crop of nuclear reactors are nothing but giant water boilers. Heavy, cumbersome, intricately complex, expensive kettles, providing steam for a steam engine, not a new magical form of energy. This statement is equally true for traditional pressurized water, molten salt, modular and even fusion reactors. Their primary form of energy output is heat, which is then turned into steam spinning turbines and generating electricity. That’s all to it.
Nuclear reactors provide low to medium heat only, which is OK if you want to use it to generate electricity or to make pulp for paper production, but not nearly enough to maintain a complex technologically advanced civilization. None of the current or proposed reactors (1) can produce the high heat needed to turn iron ore into steel, sand into molten glass, or limestone, clay and fly ash into cement. Without these materials, on the other hand, it would be impossible to build modern roads, bridges, dams, tunnels, high rise buildings and yes, new nuclear reactors. Believing that nuclear can somehow magically replace coal and natural gas in these essential high heat applications anytime soon is like thinking we could bake bread in an electric kettle. (I mean you can try, but then don’t tell me that you failed.)
Advocates of nuclear energy tend to forget how utterly dependent this civilization is on the wide-scale availability of cheap fossil fuels. The amount of heat energy provided every day by carbon rich fuels is multiples greater than all of the energy the grid delivers in the form of electricity. As of today fossil fuels still generate 82% of all the energy consumed (mostly in the form of high heat) with only a fraction of that heat being turned into electric power. The share of electricity in final energy consumption, on the other hand, remains a mere 20%. And while it’s technically possible to use nuclear energy in Hydrogen electrolysis (a proposed replacement fuel for those high heat applications) the low end-to-end energy return on investment prohibits H2's use in a relevant scale. Converting electricity to hydrogen eats up as much as half of the energy invested, while compression, piping and storage also comes with their associated losses. Hence the lack of evidence for a “hydrogen economy” emerging, despite the fact that it was proposed more than thirty years ago already.
https://thehonestsorcerer.substack.com/p/the-nuclear-non-solution
What's up with this... I visited Jakarta multiple times during the Asian Crisis... almost no cars on the streets... loads of beggars... the clubs were still open though... everything was ridiculously cheap if you were using foreign currency
Indonesian Rupiah Tumbles to Lowest Since Asian Financial Crisis
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/indonesian-rupiah-falls-lowest-since-024256957.html