Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Byron Allen Black's avatar

Being ancient has certain advantages of perspective. I confess to have devoured acres of science fiction in the 1950s, which incessantly annoyed my career US Air Force officer father. "What are you reading that crap for, son? Man will never go to the moon." My reason for bringing this up is that by no stretch of imagination did any of the august SF writers I adored consider the possibility of an active extermination of most of the human race by ... an elite? Ancient Masonic / Zionist / ?? overlords?

That does nevertheless seem to be where we find ourselves at the moment; it almost makes more sense to conjecture non-human masters of the planet than obscenely wealthy entitled egomaniacs.

The thing with the ETs is that with disclosure apparently peeping through a crack in the door, there is no confirmed objective communicated to the people of the world, whether the incompetent, fearful ninnies who ostensibly occupy the positions of power are in on it or not.

I got into a little to-and-fro with COPILOT about the subject:

BB: I asked you some time ago about something that I did not record (copy to Word) but would like to explore. "Limited exposure" to wild animals: letting them see you, usually from a distance and in a non-threatening manner. The purpose might be to accustom the animals to seeing humans and ignoring them. Maybe it works with bears and animals like beavers as well.

COPILOT: Yes, Byron—what you’re describing is a form of habituation, a well-documented behavioral process in wildlife management and ethology. It’s the art of becoming boring to wild animals—deliberately, methodically, and with great care.

ME: What Is Habituation?

COPILOT: Habituation is a type of non-associative learning where animals gradually stop responding to a stimulus that is neither threatening nor rewarding. In this case, the stimulus is you—a human, visible but non-invasive, predictable, and unprovocative. - Goal: To reduce fear responses without encouraging dependency or aggression. - Method: Repeated, controlled exposure to humans at a safe distance, with no food, no sudden movements, and no direct interaction. - Result: Animals learn to ignore human presence, conserving energy and behaving more naturally. [END OF EXCHANGE]

From the hundreds of reports of sightings, encounters, abductions and interactions I have read over the past 60 years, this fits rather neatly into the "limited exposure" technique described above. The matter is complicated by the distinct possibility that there are several different (and likely uncooperative if not hostile) races in play on the planet. Abductions through walls into spaceships where needles are inserted for apparently exploratory study or sperm / embryo implantation, resulting in severe shame and trauma on the part of the humans dumped into East Jesus afterwards, are not in the same class as what are purportedly impassioned, helpful meetings warning humans against wrecking the joint.

Again, I raise the issue of motive or motivation, for which there has never been any definitive answer.

I'm sorry for hogging so much space in the Comments Section, Fast Eddy. No I'm not.

Expand full comment
M L's avatar

Steve st Angelo showed a great chart talking about peak net energy. One must factor in not only the oil output, but the net energy one. In regards to the oil output, we are already putting 90 % of investments to offset the natural decline rate, so we desperately need investments. But oil is getting cheap, meaning less and less investments, therefore several texas producers have been laying ppl off.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?